“No-kill” policies don’t prevent animals from dying. Greg Bloomfield, Past Executive Director Toledo Area Humane Society A Deceptive Shell Game What happened to those 608 cats last year?” “The limited intake philosophy is not the solution for the problem because you’re not addressing all the animals in need. Under intense pressure from “no-kill” extremists to increase “live-release” rates and reduce euthanasia at all costs, many shelters are turning their backs on the very animals who need them most. See why “no-kill” can mean no help for the neediest cats and dogs:īecause more than 6 million dogs and cats flood animal shelters every year, “no-kill” facilities are perpetually full, with weeks- or months-long waiting lists, “managed admissions,” and appointment-based systems. Keeping animals out of shelters may keep “no-kill” shelters’ euthanasia rates low and make for effective fundraising, but it spells disaster for animals. ‘Sorry-We’re Full’Ī first-of-its-kind video reveals how, every day, animals like this abandoned dog are turned away by shelters boasting of “no-kill” policies. If the shelter had had an open-door policy-or even if it had simply transported her to a local socially conscious open-admission shelter-this dog would have been spared terror, pain, suffering, and perhaps even death. The young dog was finally euthanized because of the extent of her pain and injuries. A shelter worker found the dog struggling to stand, apparently having sustained a broken back and a crushed pelvis.

It wasn’t long before she was struck by a car. Terrified and desperate, the dog ran onto a nearby highway. The man was seen throwing a mixed-breed dog-frightened and malnourished, with every rib visible-from his vehicle before speeding off into the dark. He didn’t know anyone was watching, but he apparently did know that the limited-admission shelter often refused entry to animals in need. Right before dawn one morning, a man drove up to a “no-kill” animal shelter in Virginia.

No kill shelters near me